
A conversation is communication by two or more people, or sometimes with one’s self, on a particular topic. Conversations are the ideal form of communication in some respects, because they allow people with different views on a topic to learn from each other.
Paul Grice, a British-educated philosopher of language who spent the final two decades of his career in the U.S., noted that all conversations follow a basic set of rules which people use to express themselves when speaking.
Imagine what would happen to language if there were no rules to follow during conversations. It would be perfectly acceptable to follow “Hi, how are you doing?” with “birds fly in the sky”, or to simply lie with every statement you make. But then conversations would be impossible to have. And while everyone follows Grice’s rules, it doesn’t necessarily mean that people are aware of what the rules are or how they work. In fact, Grice’s maxims often work outside of our immediate awareness.
The question now is, what exactly are these rules? One of the most basic assumptions we must make for successful communication to take place is that both people in a conversation are cooperating - this is called the Cooperative Principle. Grice further identified 4 groups of maxims (a “maxim” is kind of like a rule of thumb) which people implicitly obey when communicating.
The four Conversational Maxims
A. Maxims of quality
1. Do not say what your believe to be false.
2. Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence.B. Maxims of quantity
1. Make your contribution as informative as required.
2. Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.C. Maxim of relation
1. Be relevant.D. Maxims of manner
1. Avoid obscurity of expression.
2. Avoid ambiguity.
3. Be brief.
4. Be orderly.
In detail
1. Maxim of Quality. According to the first rule, people are expected to say what they know to be true. When talking with each other we expect the others to tell us the truth. If your friend asks, “…have you seen my dog?” an honest answer is expected.
2. Maxim of Quantity. According to this rule, when talking, we are expected to provide just enough information to get our point across. We usually assume that people are telling us everything we need to know. If they don’t say something, then we assume they simply don’t know that information.
3. Maxim of Relation. According to this rule, you are expected to stay on the topic. In other words, make sure that what you say is relevant for what is talked about. If asked, “Isn’t Larry the biggest jerk you ever met?” you certainly won’t be on topic if you answer by saying “Uh, it sure is nice for this time of year, eh?”
4. Maxim of Manner. The last rule states that your comments should be direct, clear, and to the point. This maxim relates to the form of speech you use. You shouldn’t use words you know your listeners won’t understand or say things which you know could be taken multiple ways. You should also not state something in a long, drawn-out way if you could say it in a much simpler manner. As an example, we have “Miss Singer produced a series of sounds corresponding closely to the score of The Star-Spangled Banner” vs. “Miss Singer sang The Star-Spangled Banner.”
Why should you follow them
These maxims allow you to be more brief in communicating, since you don’t need to say everything you would need to if you were being perfectly logical - you don’t say “John has 4 and only 4 children”. Also, by exploiting or flouting a maxim, they allow you to say things indirectly to avoid some of the discomfort which comes from saying unpleasant things directly.
They can also show you how to “read between the lines.”
Grice did not assume that all people should constantly follow these maxims. Instead, he found it interesting when these were “flouted” or “violated” (either purposefully or unintentionally breaking the maxims) by speakers, which would imply some hidden meaning. Why imply instead of just saying what you mean? Well, implication can get across a great deal of meaning with relatively little actual speech. Thinking of what you want to get across and interpreting what other people have said seems to take much quicker than the relatively slow process of actually verbalizing all the necessary sounds. So saying a little, while implying a lot, is a way to avoid “phonological bottleneck” and communicate more efficiently.
What is interesting to note is the fact that these maxims may be better understood as describing the assumptions listeners normally make about the way speakers will talk, rather than prescriptions for how one ought to talk. And the implications of this fact can be a powerful and creative way to get across a point.
More conversation and communication resources on the web:
- EntertainMates.com: How to communicate bad news;
- EzineArticles.com: 4 Important Conversation Tips;
- LifeHack.org: 5 Conversation and Interaction Tips;
- Armannd.com: Improve your communication skills;
- Conversational hypnosis;
- How to be an expert persuader.







































Yet another excellent post. In the age of information overload and disappearing social graces, an age where there are more people than ever, being able to communicate well is a very important skill to develop. If most information presented was done so with these maxims in mind, communication would be much better, and information overload would be less of a problem.
In the end any communication is about getting ideas across. The more efficient the method, the better the method of communication. Thanks for sharing this info.
Thanks for stopping by, John!
The overall quality of communication between individuals would indeed increase if people would follow the basic rules. However, most people jump straight to the advanced levels, without first laying the foundation.
Glad to see that the basic, simple things, resonate with you!
Hey Armannd,
Thank You for including me. This is a great post!
Much appreciate the link.
Tina
Think Simple. Be Decisive. ~ Productivity, Simplicity & Happiness
[...] your sense of humor and you will find you are more productive, a better communicator and a superior team [...]
I need some help please… I have had dificulty for many years comunicating with my mother. From my view, she is contolling and self rightous. She will not let me ever complete my thought in a conversation. I might be lucky to get out a whole sentance before she interupts me. I tell her to let me finish, but she never does. when I tell her that I am not done with what I am tying to say, she will respond with, “I know, BUT.” and she will go on with out letting me finish what I was trying to say… She has said I am disrespectful because I insist on her letting me finish my thoughts in a conversation. I am 43 years old and the oldest of four in my family. We all have the same problem with her, but I am the only one that will stand up to her. I do not have this problem communicating with anyone else, and my siblings have said it bothers them to, but they will not confront her. They just let her walk over them in a conversation. Her will always twist what is happening and make it out to be that I am the one with the problem. I feel she is controlling and that is the underlying problem here. It greatly distresses me because I never have this problem with other people, and I would love to have a good relationship with her, but I feel that conversation is the key. I have tryed to explain to her that she cant hear what I am saying while she is talking. She always feels that she knows what I am saying before I have a chance to finnish so she starts with her part of the conversation. 99 % of the time she does not know what I am trying to say. She gets it wrong, and so her we go again, when I ask her to please let me finnish, she never does… How can I communicat to her what she is doing so we can talk with out fighting? please help
Hey Rex, sorry to hear about your problem.
It is difficult to give coherent opinions about such sensible things over the internet without having talked to all involved.
To be on the safe side, I would recommend you to simply distance yourself from her to avoid further conflicts that might worsen your relationship with her. Also, think about why you want to communicate with her. And if getting to communicate with her would involve changing her, consider the fact that people become more rigid as they age, not that it is recommended to try and change people anyway. Furthermore, do not confront her with the fact that she is the source of the communication problem you are having.
In the end, if that’s just the way she is, try to accept the situation as it is. In an open understanding way.
If it is crucial to talk to her about something and you can’t, consider consulting a marriage and family therapist.
Hope this helped.
nice entry.
very informative.
hello, my name is Amany and i am fro egypt. i want to make a research on the skip-connection theory in conversation( two ppl talking together yet none of the is concentrating with the other…..i.e. Rosencrantz and guildenstern are dead by Tom Stoppard) can u plz gimme any help wid this plzz?!
[...] D. Maxims of manner 1. Avoid obscurity of expression. 2. Avoid ambiguity. 3. Be brief. 4. Be orderly. –source [...]